ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2026
Artificial Intelligence Across the PET Reconstruction Pipeline: An Update.
Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PET reconstruction has evolved from analytic and iterative physics-based methods toward hybrid approaches that increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence (AI). As digital detectors, long-axial FOV systems, and time-of-flight technology increase data richness and computational demand, AI, particularly deep learning, is being used across the acquisition, correction, reconstruction, and postprocessing stages to stabilize low-count imaging, refine system modeling, and improve noise-resolution tradeoffs while preserving clinically relevant image interpretation. In this context, most AI methods function to augment-rather than replace-established physics-based reconstruction frameworks. Early clinical and multicenter studies have demonstrated that selected AI-based methods maintain noninferior diagnostic performance and key quantitative metrics within defined acquisition and reconstruction contexts. As these tools transition from research into routine practice, their implementation is shaped by intended-use validation, interoperability, traceability, and software lifecycle management requirements. This Review explores the application of AI across the PET reconstruction pipeline, discussing technical foundations, highlighting key clinical implications, and considering regulatory and other practical issues that govern safe and reproducible deployment. Reconstruction pipeline steps considered in the article include mathematical inversion of projection data into images, signal processing during acquisition, prereconstruction corrections, system modeling incorporated into reconstruction, and postreconstruction processing steps that directly influence reconstructed image properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.