ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
5C psychological antecedents of vaccine hesitancy toward maternal RSV vaccines and infant monoclonal antibodies among pregnant and postpartum women and their partners in China: A multicenter, dyadic survey design, cross-sectional study.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed vaccine hesitancy toward two novel respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunization strategies, maternal vaccines and infant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), among 4422 couples across eight Chinese provinces, via a multicenter cross-sectional survey with convenience sampling from medical institutions. Vaccine hesitancy was measured using the 5C scale (confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, collective responsibility), with total scores (higher indicating lower hesitancy) as the primary outcome. Linear mixed-effects models analyzed sociodemographic and pregnancy-related factors. Women had marginally lower total 5C scores than partners for maternal vaccines (45.88 [SD 5.90] vs. 46.25 [5.74]; Cohen's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.