Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42714248›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026

Pre-operative circulating tumour DNA in high-risk primary cutaneous melanoma: prospective feasibility in molecular pathology.

Magnús Pétur Bjarnason Obinah, Estrid Høgdall, Tim Svenstrup Poulsen, Karin Dreisig, Thomas Litman, Christoffer Johansen, Stig Egil Bojesen, Lisbet Rosenkrantz Hölmich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Magnús Pétur Bjarnason ObinahDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4817-9834
Estrid HøgdallMolecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4689-5658
Tim Svenstrup PoulsenMolecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9781-0541
Karin DreisigDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-6691
Thomas LitmanDepartment of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-901X
Christoffer JohansenCentre for Cancer Late Effect Research CASTLE, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-206X
Stig Egil BojesenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-4133
Lisbet Rosenkrantz HölmichDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1983-5222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCirculating tumour DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in melanoma, but its detectability in pre-operative blood from patients presenting with primary cutaneous melanoma remains incompletely evaluated. We assessed the feasibility of pre-operative ctDNA detection in high-risk primary melanoma using routinely available methods in molecular pathology. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a prospective single-institution cohort enrolled between September 2021 and December 2022, pre-operative plasma was obtained from patients with clinically suspected primary cutaneous melanoma. Patients with pathologically confirmed invasive melanoma and high-risk features (≥ T3a, ≥ N1a, or ≥ M1a) were selected for molecular analysis. Tumour tissue was analysed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify targetable BRAF or NRAS driver mutations, and pre-operative plasma was analysed for ctDNA using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for BRAF V600E or targeted NGS for other driver mutations.

resultsOf the 288 consented patients with pre-operative blood samples, 21 met high-risk criteria, and 12 had a targetable BRAF or NRAS driver mutation in tumour tissue and underwent tumour-informed plasma ctDNA analysis. Pre-operative ctDNA was not detected in any of these 12 patients (0 of 12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 26.5%). All ddPCR and NGS assay controls performed as expected, and wild-type copy counts were consistent across ddPCR samples.

interpretationThe finding is concordant with two independent studies using different methods, and a mathematical prediction of ctDNA shedding from small primary tumours. Reliable pre-operative ctDNA detection in primary melanoma may require alternative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) approaches, such as bespoke multivariant or mutation-agnostic methods.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFeasibility StudiesFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanCirculating Tumor DNAGTP PhosphohydrolasesMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID42714248
PMCPMC13573568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.