ArticleAnnals of medicine2026
Identification of rare maternal copy number variants by genome-wide analysis of noninvasive prenatal screening data in 113,017 pregnant women.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesKnowledge of copy number variants (CNVs) is relevant to maternal and fetal health and can be obtained from noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) of pregnancy. However, genome-wide analysis of maternal CNVs using NIPS data has not been conducted in large populations.
methodsFor CNV analysis, the human genome was segmented into 10 kilobase pairs (Kb) bins, and the relative sequencing depth of each bin was calculated. The circular binary segmentation algorithm was used to estimate CNVs. Detected CNVs from two pregnancies of the same participant were compared to validate the reproducibility. All CNVs were merged into CNV regions (CNVRs) to evaluate their frequency, distributions, and relationship with disease-related genes and regions.
resultsIn this study, 113,017 pregnant women were recruited. A total of 363,886 CNVs larger than 50 Kb were detected in 101,779 individuals and merged into 43,005 CNVRs. For evaluating the reproducibility of CNVs, 90.18% of deletions and 88.07% of duplications were consistent. In general, 78.13% of individuals carried CNVRs that overlapped protein-coding genes, while 14.76% overlapped OMIM genes. We detected 246 novel CNVRs, 134 (54.47%) involving protein-coding genes. For the perspective of maternal-fetal health, we identified 4,984 (4.41%) individuals as carriers of 5,243 CNVs containing known pathogenic or likely pathogenic regions, including 22q11.2 region and DMD gene..
conclusionsNIPS sequencing data is a reliable source for maternal CNV detection. These CNVs constitute an integrate component in maternal-fetal health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.