ArticleActa orthopaedica2026
Association of preoperative flexion contracture and limited knee flexion with short-term patient-reported outcomes after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeWe aimed to clarify whether preoperative flexion contracture (FC) and limited knee flexion in patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (OA) were associated with postoperative outcomes in mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated all patients who underwent mobile-bearing medial UKA. Preoperative extension and flexion angles, and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS) recorded preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months, were assessed. Patients were categorized by preoperative extension (no FC, < 10°, ≥ 10°) and flexion angles (< 120°, ≥ 120°). Changes in OKS and FJS were compared using general linear models with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and preoperative scores.
results1,199 patients were included. Preoperatively, 85% of patients had full extension, 12% had < 10° FC, and 3.1% had ≥ 10° FC. Regarding flexion, 40% had < 120°, while 60% had ≥ 120°. At 12 months, the < 10° FC group showed greater improvements than the ≥ 10° FC group in OKS (adjusted mean difference, 5.5 points; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-10.2; P = 0.01) and FJS (17.0 points; CI 1.0-33.0; P = 0.03). The < 120° flexion group showed greater FJS improvement than the ≥ 120° flexion group (adjusted mean difference, 4.8 points; CI 0.1-9.6; P = 0.045). At 24 months, the CIs for all between-group differences included no difference.
conclusionMild preoperative FC and mild-to-moderately limited knee flexion were not associated with inferior outcomes. Patients with more pronounced FC showed slower recovery but still achieved the same increase in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as those with mild FC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.