ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Narrow-band UV-B (TL-01) Phototherapy Exposure and Skin Cancer Risk: A Nested Case-control Study.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Narrow-band TL-01 ultraviolet B phototherapy (TL-01) is generally considered a relatively safe treatment for skin diseases, although conflicting findings have also been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the association between TL-01 exposure and skin cancer risk using a nested case-control design within a Finnish cohort of 4,815 patients treated with TL-01 monotherapy, with subsequent 38 cases of basal cell carcinoma, 13 cases of cutaneous melanoma, and 9 cases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Four matched controls were selected for each skin cancer case. Personal TL-01 exposure data were obtained from hospital records. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). An increased risk for basal cell carcinoma was observed with higher TL-01 exposure (OR per 20 sessions 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.72), whereas no association was found for cutaneous melanoma or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. In a categorical analysis, with category of 1-29 TL-01 sessions as the reference, the risk of basal cell carcinoma was markedly elevated among patients who received ≥60 sessions (OR 4.16, 95% CI 1.49-11.6). Occupational outdoor work was considered a potential confounder, but it had no effect. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.