Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713874›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2026

Finlay-Wilkinson random regression for yield and yield stability prediction in cereals.

Pablo Sandro, Justin Blancon, Jeffrey Neyhart, Julie Dawson, Lucia Gutiérrez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pablo SandroDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Justin BlanconUMR GDEC, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jeffrey NeyhartUSDA-ARS, Genetic Improvement for Fruits & Vegetables Laboratory, Chatsworth, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1991-5310
Julie DawsonDepartment of Plant and Agroecosystem Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Lucia GutiérrezDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2957-3086

Funding

College of Agricultural and Life Sciences (CIAS)FranceAgriMerFrench National Research National Agency (BreedWheat project ANR-10-BTBR-03)National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2023-51300-40916National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Fund WISO1984National Institute of Food and Agriculture USDA-AFRI-NIFA 2022-68013-36439 (WheatCAP)National Institute of Food and Agriculture USDA-AFRI-NIFA-OREI 2020-51300-32379National Institute of Food and Agriculture USDA-SARE 2018-LNC18-400National Institute of Food and Agriculture WIS03002United States Department of AgricultureUW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Year-to-year climate variability poses a challenge for agriculture by increasing crop yield variability; therefore, there is a need to identify genotypes that can withstand these fluctuations. With the right selection criteria, genotypes with yield stability across variable environmental conditions can be selected. Methods such as Finlay-Wilkinson random regression (FWRR) may allow us to use sparse datasets-common in plant breeding pipelines-and incorporate genomic data to leverage phenotypic information from related genotypes to predict yield stability. Our objective was to examine how the number of environments and the variance among those environments affect stability predictions. We also integrate FWRR as a genomic prediction tool for characterizing yield stability, comparing it to the traditional genomic prediction models as a reference. We used three datasets: one highly unbalanced dataset for oats (Avena sativa L.) and two completely balanced datasets with different numbers of environments for barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We fit standard Finlay-Wilkinson (FW) and FWRR models to estimate grain yield and stability under various scenarios. We found that the estimated stability values obtained were similar using balanced datasets for FW or FWRR. FWRR also achieved moderate predictive ability for stability using unbalanced datasets under 10-fold cross-validation (CV1) with new genotypes. In terms of environmental representation, selecting the right set of environments for inclusion in the model was more important than adding more environments. Our results suggest the possibility of using FWRR to select stable genotypes earlier in line development, as well as to design resource-efficient stability-testing schemes.

Indexed as

AvenaEdible GrainHordeumTriticumGenotypeModels, GeneticPlant BreedingPrediction AlgorithmsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42713874
PMCPMC13555820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.