ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2026
Metagenomic Insights Into Microbial Diversity of Tea Rhizosphere of the Kangra Valley.
Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides the first metagenomic assessment of microbial diversity from the tea rhizosphere of the Kangra valley. Tea rhizosphere soil samples were collected from 4 locations (Dharamshala, Baijnath, Palampur, and Joginder Nagar) of the Kangra valley. DNA extracts of rhizosphere samples were analysed for bacterial and Archaeal diversity using amplicon sequencing (V3-V4) region of the 16S rRNA gene and Fungal diversity using ITS1 and ITS2 regions. Baijnath and Palampur samples showed the highest bacterial richness, while Dharamshala and Palampur had the highest fungal richness. Proteobacteria was a dominant phylum in all the rhizosphere samples, followed by Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Bacteroidetes. A total of 11 fungal phyla were identified among all the locations, with abundance of Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. For the Archaea domain, uncultured archaeon and Aeropyrum camini were the most common found among all the locations. A small fraction (< 0.5%) of Bacillus and Pseudomonas species were observed among all the locations. Alpha and beta diversity indices displayed notable differences within and between microbial diversities. Soil factors were variably associated with microbial diversity, with nitrogen positively aligned with fungal diversity, while EC and K were associated with Archaeal diversity. Soil pH and OM% showed moderate associations with bacterial diversity. These findings provided valuable and comprehensive insights into tea rhizosphere microbial ecology and could be used to better understand microbial functions and their role in plant health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.