ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Model-Informed Dose Selection of Intranasal Epinephrine in Young Children.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a rapid, potentially fatal allergic reaction with a global prevalence of 0.04%-1.8%. Early intramuscular epinephrine administration is recommended. However, fear, pain, cost, or social barriers often delay treatment, leading to poor outcomes. To address these challenges, an intranasal (IN) epinephrine formulation was developed. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data for IN epinephrine are absent in children <4 years (7.5-15 kg) and limited in children ≥4 years. To inform pediatric dosing, we developed a population PK model to support weight-based dosing (≥30 kg, 15-<30 kg, and 7.5-<15 kg) in children. Pooled single-dose IN epinephrine data from six studies (five adults, one pediatric), with 255 subjects and 3564 observations, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM v7.5). Data handling included baseline imputation, exclusion of endogenous concentrations (>4 h), and BLQ management via the M4 method. One- and two-compartment models with allometric scaling by body weight were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using diagnostic plots, objective function value, and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). Pediatric exposure simulations used CDC-based virtual populations to guide weight-based dosing. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data, with acceptable relative standard error <30% and no evidence of model misspecification. pcVPC demonstrated good agreement across adult and pediatric subgroups. Simulations indicated that the pediatric doses of 2 mg (≥30 kg) and 1 mg (15-<30 kg) achieved exposure comparable to the adult 2 mg reference, supporting the dosing strategy. Model-informed simulations support weight-based IN epinephrine dosing in young children, addressing a critical gap in anaphylaxis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.