Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713770›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2026

Model-Informed Dose Selection of Intranasal Epinephrine in Young Children.

Manav Jain, Priscila A Yamamoto, Amira Soliman, Richard Lowenthal, Valvanera Vozmediano, Stephan Schmidt, Natalia de Moraes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manav JainDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6365-8411
Priscila A YamamotoDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2805-7960
Amira SolimanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9175-5702
Richard LowenthalARS Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA, USA.
Valvanera VozmedianoDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2636-1889
Stephan SchmidtDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4998-1167
Natalia de MoraesDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Center for Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4389-058X

Funding

ARS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a rapid, potentially fatal allergic reaction with a global prevalence of 0.04%-1.8%. Early intramuscular epinephrine administration is recommended. However, fear, pain, cost, or social barriers often delay treatment, leading to poor outcomes. To address these challenges, an intranasal (IN) epinephrine formulation was developed. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data for IN epinephrine are absent in children <4 years (7.5-15 kg) and limited in children ≥4 years. To inform pediatric dosing, we developed a population PK model to support weight-based dosing (≥30 kg, 15-<30 kg, and 7.5-<15 kg) in children. Pooled single-dose IN epinephrine data from six studies (five adults, one pediatric), with 255 subjects and 3564 observations, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM v7.5). Data handling included baseline imputation, exclusion of endogenous concentrations (>4 h), and BLQ management via the M4 method. One- and two-compartment models with allometric scaling by body weight were evaluated. Model performance was assessed using diagnostic plots, objective function value, and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPC). Pediatric exposure simulations used CDC-based virtual populations to guide weight-based dosing. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data, with acceptable relative standard error <30% and no evidence of model misspecification. pcVPC demonstrated good agreement across adult and pediatric subgroups. Simulations indicated that the pediatric doses of 2 mg (≥30 kg) and 1 mg (15-<30 kg) achieved exposure comparable to the adult 2 mg reference, supporting the dosing strategy. Model-informed simulations support weight-based IN epinephrine dosing in young children, addressing a critical gap in anaphylaxis management.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisEpinephrineModels, BiologicalAdministration, IntranasalAdultBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantMaleEpinephrineepinephrineintranasal drug administrationpediatricspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID42713770
PMCPMC13555672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.