Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713731›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Hybrid Non-Informative and Informative Prior Model-Assisted Designs for Mid-Trial Dose Insertion.

Masahiro Kojima, Kana Yamada, Hisato Sunami, Kentaro Takeda, Keisuke Hanada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masahiro KojimaChuo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-7692
Kana YamadaInstitute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hisato SunamiThe University of Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kentaro TakedaAstellas Pharma Global Development Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Keisuke HanadaWakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP26K21184JSPS KAKENHI JP26K21185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In oncology phase I trials, model-assisted designs have been increasingly adopted because they enable adaptive yet operationally simple dose adjustment based on accumulating safety data, leading to a paradigm shift in dose-escalation methodology. In practice, a single mid-trial dose insertion may be considered to examine safer doses and/or to collect more informative efficacy data. In this study, we investigate methods to improve dose assignment and the selection of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or the optimal biological dose (OBD) when a new dose level is added during an ongoing trial under a model-assisted framework, by assigning informative prior information to the inserted dose. We propose a hybrid design that uses a non-informative model-assisted design at trial initiation and, upon dose insertion, applies an informative-prior extension only to the newly added dose. In addition, to address potential skeleton misspecification, we propose two adaptive extensions: (i) an online-weighting approach that updates the skeleton over time, and (ii) a Bayesian-mixture approach that robustly combines multiple candidate skeletons. We evaluate the proposed methods through simulation studies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicMaximum Tolerated DoseModels, StatisticalResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansAntineoplastic AgentsBayesian optimal interval designinformative designnon‐informative designoptimal biological dose

Identifiers

PMID42713731
PMCPMC13555521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.