ReviewThe Journal of physiology2026
Impact of the brainstem in normal and impaired human movement control.
Review in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The corticospinal tract represents a highly developed neural system that dominates motor control in humans. This allows the performance of skilled finger movements, such as playing the piano. In contrast, according to preclinical studies, automatically performed complex movements, such as locomotion or cooperative forelimb movements, appear to be controlled mainly by brainstem motor centres. Only in recent years, with the advancement of new methodologies, has evidence emerged that limb coordination in humans is also based on neural limb coupling mediated by brainstem motor centres. This neural limb coupling is reflected in the observation that, during a movement, unilateral electrical nerve stimulation elicits muscle responses not only in the stimulated but also in the contralateral limb(s), involved in the respective motor task. The finding that activation of the reticulospinal system by loud acoustic stimuli evokes muscle responses that closely resemble the configuration of 'coupling responses' induced by electrical nerve stimulation suggests a contribution of the brainstem to the neural coupling mechanism. In addition to its role in interlimb coordination during stepping or cooperative hand movements, the reticulospinal system seems to be involved in the control of other motor tasks, including posture, reaching and force development. Furthermore, recent evidence indicates that brainstem motor centres contribute to functional recovery after stroke and spinal cord injury. These observations suggest that the brainstem plays a major role in motor control not only in animals but also in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.