ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Development and evaluation of manualized approaches for telephone-based outreach in suicide prevention.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: We describe the process of development and evaluation of manualized approaches for two types of telephone outreach: Telephone contacts (TC) and Telephone-based psychosocial intervention (TBPI). TC comprised inquiry into suicidal ideation and reminders for mental health hygiene. TBPI comprised psychosocial counseling in addition to TC components. Trained research associates (RAs) delivered TC and TBPI to individuals with a history of suicide attempts. Telephone outreach was an addon to the usual follow-up care in such individuals. Methods: We developed manuals from extensive literature review and consensus. We evaluated the approaches by fidelity assessments to specific components of the outreach and overall acceptability. We used a cross-sectional study design for evaluation of approaches. An independent rater evaluated fidelity by reviewing audio recordings of TC and TBPI. Individuals who received the telephone outreach rated the acceptability on a visual Likert scale of 1-10 (1 was the least and 10 was the maximum acceptable score). Results: We developed two telephone outreach manuals structured in a narrative format in an algorithmic approach with similar sections for rapport, inquiry into suicidal ideation and reminders for mental health hygiene. The TBPI manual included a psychosocial counseling section. Fidelity assessment of 168 telephone outreach sessions showed adherence of 80% or more to the manuals in 78.57% of the participants. The mean acceptability score was 7.6 out of 10 for the telephone outreach (SD: 1.75, Conclusion: We demonstrate that manualized approaches for telephone outreach in suicide prevention are an acceptable strategy that can be delivered with optimal fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.