ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
A qualitative exploration of the lived experiences and views of users of mental health services after self-harm.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Individuals at risk of suicide have low engagement with mental health services (MHS). Reasons for this include stigma about suicide, inadequate public awareness, and the difficulty in approaching MHS. Lived experiences of users of MHS might yield insights into this low engagement and improve the access to mental health interventions for users. Aim: To explore the lived experiences and views of individuals with self-harm who were users of specialist MHS in a tertiary general hospital setting. Methods: We used a qualitative study design with in-depth interviews. We included participants who had used inpatient or outpatient MHS for a self-harm attempt. We used a realist approach to thematic analysis and Results: We recruited 25 participants (16 women and nine men) between 18 and 43 years. All participants had completed a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of telephone outreach in suicide prevention. The themes generated were the participants' inherent attitudes toward self-harm and suicide, their experiences of MHS, their perspectives on treatments that helped with suicidal ideation, and the impact of their experiences with MHS on future help-seeking. Conclusions: The user perspectives of MHS appear to be influenced by their inherent pre-existing beliefs about suicide. Users find specific interventions for suicidal ideation beneficial and healthcare infrastructural problems as challenges. Individuals with persistent difficulties after self-harm were more likely to engage with healthcare services. The study limitation was the absence of perspectives from those individuals who dropped out from MHS and other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.