ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Use of artificial intelligence to assess gait parameters in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Falls and fall-related injuries are significant public health issues for older adults, especially those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This study examined how an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled assessment using in-home sensor-derived changes in functional mobility and gait compares to performance-based clinical assessment in older adults with and without MCI. Research Design and Methods: We conducted a longitudinal, single-cohort observational study, recruiting 75 community-dwelling older adults residing in retirement and senior living communities (eligible if aged 65+ and able to walk household distances). Participants were assessed for MCI. A depth sensor, installed in each participant's residence, recorded in-home movement as silhouette depth images over a one-year period. AI/machine learning algorithms automatically identified, segmented, and analyzed walking segments to extract gait speed, stride time, stride length, and height of the individual walking. Timed Up and Go (TUG) score, gait speed, stride length, and stride time were captured continuously by the AI system and by a clinical expert at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Results: The correlation between AI-based and performance-based TUG was strong and positive ( Discussion and Implications: This study demonstrates that AI-enabled in-home monitoring can capture clinically meaningful indicators of functional mobility among older adults with and without MCI. As slowed gait speed and altered stride variability precede cognitive decline and heightened fall risk, a continuous in-home assessment can facilitate proactive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.