ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Time-Frequency Analysis of Muscle Activation Patterns during the Instep Kick in Elite and Amateur Soccer Players.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The instep kick is a frequently performed, high-load soccer skill that requires precise intermuscular coordination around ball contact. This study compared time-frequency activation patterns between elite and amateur male soccer players across two kicking phases and identified the key time windows and dominant muscle contributions. Surface electromyography was recorded from seven muscles of the kicking leg in 15 elite and 15 amateur players: rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, tibialis anterior, medial gastrocnemius, and lateral gastrocnemius. The instep kick was divided into Phase 1, from maximum hip extension to ball contact, and Phase 2, from post-contact follow-through to maximum hip flexion. Morlet wavelet analysis was used to generate time-frequency intensity maps. Global principal component analysis was then performed to extract PC1 to PC6, and between-group differences in PC score trajectories were assessed using SPM1D independent-samples t tests, with significance evaluated under a Bonferroni adjusted threshold for the 12 PC phase comparisons. In Phase 1, PC3 showed a significant between-group difference at 54-75% of the normalized time (peak t = 7.62, p < 0.001, Hedges' g = 2.96), with higher scores in the elite group. In Phase 2, PC1 differed significantly between groups at 60-70% of the normalized time (peak t = -9.88, p < 0.001, Hedges' g = -2.03), with higher scores in the amateur group. Elite players showed a more temporally focused pre-contact activation pattern centered on mid-frequency components of the biceps femoris, whereas amateur players showed greater reliance on higher-frequency components of the medial gastrocnemius during the post-contact follow-through. These findings suggest that skill-level differences are expressed as phase-specific redistribution of muscle and frequency-band activity within critical time windows, rather than as a simple global difference in activation magnitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.