ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
The demand-side challenges in public mental health: A narrative study in a rural South Indian community.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In the context of public mental healthcare delivery in India, in contrast to the often highlighted challenges related to the supply side, the demand-side challenges (DSC) are rarely examined systematically. Objective: To assess the DSC in patients with psychiatric disorders and their caregivers in a rural South Indian community. Methods: This study was conducted as part of a larger implementation research in which all adults in a predefined catchment area were screened for mental disorders, followed by confirmation of diagnosis by mental health professionals. The patients were counseled about (a) the need to start/resume/continue treatment and (b) the availability of services at the nearest health facility. DSC were evaluated by a targeted question to the patient/family members on reasons for not accessing/continuing treatment. Results: Among the 268 confirmed treatment-naïve patients at baseline, only 6 (0.02%) could be convinced to contact a treatment facility within the next 8 weeks. Regarding DSCs, for all disorders put together, factors related to the illnesses themselves (aggression, hostility, intoxication with substances, absence of insight, and, in instances specific to substance use, lack of motivation to stop its use were present in almost all (98.7%) patients. Lack of perceived dysfunction/disability (42.3%) and poor awareness (24.9%) formed the other two common factors. Disorder-wise breakup showed that poor awareness was predominant in Common Mental Disorders (CMDs; 60%). Illness-related factors predominated in Severe Mental Disorders (SMDs; 66.6%) and Substance Use Disorders (SUDs; 98.7%). Lack of perceived dysfunction mattered next for SUDs (42.3%), followed by poor awareness (24.9%). For SMDs, family support-related factors (47.9%) ranked second, followed by poor awareness (25%). Conclusion: DSCs significantly contribute to the treatment gap. Merely making the treatment available and accessible will not be sufficient for people to accept it. Aggressive and sustained public health measures/campaigns need to be incorporated to effectively tackle DSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.