ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Reliability of Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull in Youth Male Basketball Players Across Age Categories.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the reliability of peak force (PF) and rate of force development (RFD) from the Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull (IMTP) in 59 male basketball players from a Japanese professional club's youth academy classified into three age categories (U12: n = 18, U15: n = 27, and U18: n = 14). Each athlete completed three IMTP sessions, from which PF and mean RFD were calculated over time intervals of 0-50, 0-100, 0-150, 0-200, and 0-250 ms. Within-session and between-day reliabilities were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and standard error of measurement (SEM). PF demonstrated consistently high reliability across all age categories for both within-session and between-day analyses (ICC 0.77-0.98, CV 3.4-8.2%), with small SEM values (7.65-91.86 N, 0.60-4.13%) indicating limited measurement error. In contrast, RFD displayed poor reliability in shorter time windows (0-50 and 0-100 ms; ICC < 0.50), particularly in categories U12 and U15. Although longer time windows (0-150 and 0-250 ms) achieved higher reliability (ICC > 0.75) and lower SEM values than those previously reported, the CV values remained high (10.7-34.8%). Such a large variability may obscure true performance changes. Consequently, the PF is recommended as a robust metric for young athletes across all age groups. In contrast, the current protocol limits the ability of RFD to accurately detect individual changes. Therefore, RFD requires careful interpretation and protocol modifications, such as extended familiarization, to improve stability and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.