ArticleJournal of sports science & medicine2026
Muscle Synergy Reorganization and Force-Time Differences Across Upper-Limb Pushing Tasks with Different Mechanical Characteristics.
Article in Journal of sports science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the neuromuscular control strategies and force-time profiles of three upper-limb pushing tasks-the standard push-up (SP), plyometric push-up (PP), and standard squat push-up (SSP)-representing the endurance-, power-, and strength-oriented continuum of upper-limb pushing performance. Fifteen male rugby athletes performed SP, PP, and SSP on dual force plates while surface electromyography (EMG) (12 muscles) and vertical forces were concurrently recorded. EMG signals were processed and decomposed using nonnegative matrix factorization to extract muscle synergies. Synergy modules were evaluated using cosine similarity and paired-samples t tests. One-dimensional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM1D) was employed to compare synergy primitives and force-time profiles across tasks. Two synergies reconstructed all tasks (VAF > 0.95). Synergy modules differed among conditions (cosine similarity < 0.90), with task-specific changes mainly involving distal forearm, scapular-trunk, and elbow-extensor muscle weightings. SPM1D identified task-specific differences in synergy primitive 1 during 0%-12% and 48% - 71%, and in primitive 2 during 71% - 100%, with PP and SSP exhibiting higher late-phase activation. PP generated higher force than SP during 13% - 79%, while SSP produced higher force during 33% - 36% and 56% - 83%, but lower force early and near takeoff. Despite sharing two synergies, the three pushing tasks exhibited distinct synergy structures, activation timing, and force-time profiles. PP emphasized rapid early-to-mid phase propulsion, whereas SSP relied on sustained late-phase force. These findings demonstrate task-specific neuromechanical regulation and may help inform exercise selection for upper-limb strength and power development in trained athletic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.