ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Report Cards as a Sustainability Tool for Guideline Adherence in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality; yet, adherence to national guidelines remains variable. Methods: We conducted a single-center quality improvement initiative in our 48-bed pediatric intensive care unit at a level 1 trauma center. Interventions included adding a TBI order set to the electronic health record and a structured "report card" audit-and-feedback system to monitor compliance with specified metrics in the first 72 hours of admission. The primary outcome measure was the number of severe TBI encounters with 50% or greater adherence to institutional guidelines. Process measures included the use of the order set and timeliness of report card dissemination. Key clinical metrics were also tracked. Analyses involved run charts, descriptive statistics, and nonparametric tests. Results: Of 72 children with severe TBI admitted, 60 were eligible for full guideline adherence assessment. Order set adoption increased from 13% to 92% following the implementation of the report cards and remained above 89% annually thereafter. Guideline adherence increased from 21% to 38.9% postreport cards and stabilized between 42.9% and 59.8% thereafter. Adherence was highest for temperature management, seizure prophylaxis, and cerebral perfusion pressure, whereas sodium and carbon dioxide targets remained challenging. Mortality did not differ by adherence. Higher adherence correlated with longer pediatric intensive care unit, hospital, and rehabilitation stays. Conclusions: Decision support tools and audit and feedback improved adherence to severe pediatric TBI guidelines. Future multicenter studies should assess how adherence affects functional recovery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.