ArticleJBMR plus2026
The socioeconomic impacts of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: evidence from a retrospective case-control study in France.
Article in JBMR plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an ultra-rare genetic bone disorder associated with considerable clinical, economic, and societal impacts on patients, their caregivers, and the healthcare system. The aim of this study was to update the estimated prevalence of FOP in France, characterize the FOP patient population and impact of the disease, assess associated mortality rates, and quantify healthcare resource utilization and socioeconomic costs for individuals with FOP. An observational, retrospective case-control study was conducted using linked data for individuals with FOP from the French National Rare Diseases Registry and the French National Healthcare System Database (SNDS). Results were compared with the SNDS for a control group of individuals with any disease other than FOP. Prevalence of FOP was estimated at 1.39 per million. Data were available for 77 individuals with FOP and 769 controls without FOP. Of 70 individuals with FOP and a social security number at the index date, 50.0% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.