ArticleIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR
Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening for Identification of Adenosine Deaminase Inhibitors.
Article in Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a key enzyme in purine metabolism, and abnormal ADA activity has been associated with various diseases, including severe combined immunodeficiency, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and liver diseases. Objectives: This study employed a pharmacophore-based virtual screening strategy to identify novel ADA inhibitors from an in-house library. Methods: Two crystal structures of ADA co-crystallized with erythro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-nonyl) adenine (EHNA) and pentostatin were used to develop a pharmacophore model. The validated model was used to screen an in-house library. The resulting hits were further evaluated using molecular docking with AutoDock Vina. The compound with the highest binding affinity in the docking study was subsequently assessed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and in silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis. Results: The validated pharmacophore model comprised one hydrogen bond donor, one hydrogen bond acceptor, and one aromatic ring. When evaluated against the DUDE-Z database set, the model demonstrated acceptable sensitivity and specificity, with an enrichment factor of 23. Screening of the in-house library identified four promising hits. Compound 154 was the most notable hit because of its potent binding affinity and favorable interactions with key amino acids in the ADA active site. MD simulations showed that the ADA-compound 154 complex remained stable throughout the 150 ns simulation. MM-GBSA energy analysis indicated favorable binding driven by van der Waals and electrostatic interactions. Per-residue decomposition analysis identified critical residues contributing to complex stabilization. Compared with reference ADA inhibitors, compound 154 exhibited similar drug-likeness and pharmacokinetic properties, although further toxicity optimization may be required. Conclusions: These results suggest that compound 154 is a promising lead for developing new ADA inhibitors and underscore the effectiveness of computational methods in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.