Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026

A pilot self-coach alignment audit in NCAA collegiate rowers: field feasibility, null findings, and design-sensitivity analysis for future self-verification research.

Zacharias Papadakis, Andreas Stamatis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zacharias PapadakisDepartment of Health Sciences & Clinical Practice, Barry University, Miami Shores, FL, United States.
Andreas StamatisDepartment of Health & Sport Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Testing relational mechanisms like self-verification (SV) in competitive collegiate sport is constrained by field-feasible measurement and the small-N problem. We introduce a brief alignment audit and evaluate its field feasibility and statistical behavior in a single-team pilot. Methods: NCAA Division II women rowers ( Results: Head-coach preference was stable at 33.3% across all 48 observations. Athlete-level analyses converged on a null: logistic regression returned OR = 1.01 [95% CI (0.71, 1.56), Conclusions: Perceived self-coach alignment was not detectably associated with self-reported coach preference. This reflects the inability of a single-team,

Indexed as

measurement stabilitymental toughnessnull resultssmall sample sizestatistical powerunderpowered studies

Identifiers

PMID42713403
PMCPMC13552130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.