ArticleIEEE open journal of the Computer Society2026
Governance-Aware AI Workflow Infrastructure for Secure and Policy-Compliant Healthcare Analytics.
Article in IEEE open journal of the Computer Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modern healthcare analytics increasingly relies on complex AI-driven workflows operating over sensitive datasets across institutional boundaries. Ensuring secure, auditable, and policy-compliant execution of these workflows remains a significant challenge. Existing systems typically treat workflow generation, policy enforcement, and execution auditing as separate concerns, resulting in fragmented governance mechanisms. This article proposes a governance-aware workflow lifecycle architecture for AI-driven analytics workflows that integrates natural language workflow synthesis, blockchain-based policy enforcement, and auditable execution, embedding governance directly within the workflow lifecycle. In our framework, large language models translate user requests into executable analytics workflows represented using Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Access control policies defined in XACML are compiled into smart contracts that enforce policy compliance and record immutable audit logs on a blockchain. Sensitive datasets remain off-chain while metadata and compliance events are securely recorded. We implement a prototype platform for healthcare analytics demonstrating the generation and execution of survival analysis workflows. We further evaluate the robustness of LLM-generated workflows through an ablation study examining how prompt structure affects BPMN diagram correctness and completeness. Results highlight both the promise and limitations of automated workflow generation in regulated analytics environments. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of integrating governance mechanisms directly into AI workflow infrastructures, providing a foundation for secure and auditable analytics in sensitive domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.