ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2026
Proximal Tibial Giant Cell Tumor in a Skeletally Immature Child: A Diagnostic Dilemma and Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a benign, locally aggressive neoplasm that primarily involves the epiphysis of long bones in skeletally mature individuals. It is extremely rare in skeletally immature patients. We report a rare case of proximal tibial GCT in a 7-year-old girl with a pathological fracture and metadiaphyseal extension, highlighting diagnostic considerations and long-term outcomes. Case Report: A 7-year-old girl presented with pain, swelling, and deformity of the left upper leg following trivial trauma. Radiographs and non-contrast computed tomography scan demonstrated an expansile, eccentric osteolytic lesion in the proximal tibia metadiaphyseal region with a fracture. The patient underwent intralesional curettage, autologous cancellous bone grafting supplemented with synthetic graft, and stabilization with external fixation. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of GCT. At 4-year follow-up, the patient remains asymptomatic without deformity, limb-length discrepancy, or recurrence. Conclusion: GCT should be considered in the differential diagnosis of eccentric osteolytic lesions in the metadiaphyseal region of long bones in the immature skeleton, even when imaging mimics other benign entities such as aneurysmal bone cyst or non-ossifying fibroma. Adequate curettage and reconstruction can result in excellent functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.