Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713336›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026

Outcome of services for patients with Common Mental Disorders (CMDs): A prospective cohort study.

Varun S Mehta, D Ram, Triptish Bhatia, Mary E Hawk, James E Egan, Ferdinand Kerketta, Pc Justin Raj, Aqueel Ahamed, Smita N Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Varun S MehtaDepartment of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
D RamDepartment of Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Triptish BhatiaNational Coordinating Unit ICMR for NMHP Project, Psychiatric Research Infrastructure for Intervention and Implementation in India (PRIIIA), New Delhi, India.
Mary E HawkBehavioral and Community Health Sciences, Evaluation Institute for Public Health, Center for LGBT Health Research University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James E EganBehavioral and Community Health Sciences, Faculty in Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ferdinand KerkettaCounsellor, State Cell-TeleManas Cell, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Pc Justin RajCentral Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Aqueel AhamedMedical Social Worker, ESIC Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Smita N DeshpandeDepartment of Psychiatry, St John's Medical College Hospital, St John's National Academy of Health Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

Psychiatric research infrastructure for intervention and implementation in India – TEAMSD43TW009114 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Smita N Deshpande, Mary Elizabeth Hawk · 2014 to 2026
$3.2M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depressive and anxiety disorders, together contribute to over 50% of the Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). While outcomes for severe mental illnesses have been extensively studied, outcome-based research on CMDs remains limited. Aim: To evaluate the needs, barriers, caregiver involvement, recovery and service satisfaction of patients with CMDs as a measure of service outcome. Methods: This prospective cohort study included 274 patients with CMDs diagnosed per ICD-10 criteria. Participants were assessed at baseline and six months using researcher-rated and service user-rated outcome measures. Instruments included the Camberwell Assessment of Needs-Research (CAN-R), Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE v3), Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ), and Importance of Services in Recovery (INSPIRE). Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) and negative binomial regression were employed to analyze outcomes over time. Results: At baseline, 90.9% of participants had needs, with unmet needs comprising 80.7%. Major unmet needs were psychological distress (73.4%), looking after the home (57.7%), and daytime activities (50.7%). Depression had the highest impact on unmet needs, contributing to a 32% increase per unit rise in depression severity (IRR = 1.318, Conclusions: CMD patients had significant unmet needs, especially for psychological distress, household, and daily activities. Depression was the largest contributor to unmet needs, while panic and somatic disorders were lower. Caregiver burden evolved, and non-stigma-related barriers to care were significant.

Indexed as

Barriers to carecaregiver involvementCommon Mental Disorders (CMDs)outcome of servicesrecoveryservice satisfactionunmet needs

Identifiers

PMID42713336
PMCPMC13553097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.