ArticleTranslational animal science2026
Evaluation of large language model performance in translating dairy-related content.
Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence's ability to translate dairy-related texts from English to Spanish has not been well described in agriculture. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and comprehensibility of dairy-related translated text generated with ChatGPT (GPT-4o) and to determine the text's appropriateness for a dairy employee. Eight dairy udder health and stockmanship-related English texts were gathered from extension and university websites for translation. Four texts were summaries of 260 words or less and the other four texts were procedure lists with 8 steps. The texts were translated with a large language model (ChatGPT-4o) and displayed in a side-by-side presentation. The presentations were sent to 23 reviewers with a rubric for evaluation of accuracy, comprehensibility, and perception of the translation. Additionally, the reviewers were asked to evaluate if the translations were suitable to be shared with dairy employees. Overall, reviewers "Strongly agreed" or "Agreed" that the texts were accurately translated, including technical terms, and that the main idea of the text was correctly reproduced. They also "Strongly agreed" or "Agreed" that the translation was easy to understand, flowed naturally, was clear and coherent, and there was consistent translation of phrases that were repeated. Additionally, reviewers believed that there were "None" or "Few" instances where the meaning of the text is unclear due to the translation. Finally, the reviewers mostly agreed that they would present the translations to dairy employees. Thus, ChatGPT (GPT-4o) can accurately and comprehensibly translate dairy-related text. However, it is important to still have oversight and review the output.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.