ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Psychometric properties of MERIT: A concise tool for community health workers to screen priority mental disorders.
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Task shifting is an accepted way to address the treatment gap for mental health disorders. Community Health Workers (CHWs) can play vital roles through screening, referral, and providing basic counseling. To address the dearth of a concise screening instrument for CHWs, the "Mental HEalth ScReenIng Tool for Community Health Workers in India [MERIT]" was designed and developed. In this paper, we have examined the psychometric properties of MERIT. Methods: MERIT consists of nine stems (consisting of 11 questions) covering the following five domains: (a) Substance Abuse (alcohol, tobacco), (b) Anxiety, (c) Depression and Somatoform symptoms, (d) Severe Mental Illnesses, and (e) Suicidal risk. MERIT can be applied to one key informant of the household to screen for all its adult members. Mental health professionals (MHPs) with community psychiatry expertise undertook the face and content validity exercise (for both English and Kannada versions; 17 and 11, respectively) and rated the 'adequacy' (ability to pick up a mental health issue) of each of the questions on a Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). For each of the domains, the item-content validity index (I-CVI) of more than 0.8 was considered adequate. Concurrent validity was examined through concordance between the screened status as per Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs; quintessential CHWs; n = 16; n = 116 households) and the independent clinical impression derived by seven MHPs. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was examined by measuring the concordance between the two groups of ASHAs (first group; n = 7, second group; n = 9), who independently screened the same 116 households. Results: All experts (for both English and Kannada versions) gave a rating of 3 or more for each of the MERIT domains. I-CVI of each domain was > 0.8 (0.86 for English and 0.80 for Kannada). Concurrent validity [n = 116; k = 0.792 indicating substantial agreement between ASHAs and MHPs; Conclusion: MERIT is concise, valid, and reliable for CHWs to screen for priority psychiatric disorders among adults. While its sensitivity is comparatively lower, it can be easily integrated into public health programs as it offers the advantage of covering the entire household by interviewing one of its key informants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.