ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Large periampullary mass with vascular contact: Diagnostic and surgical decision-making in a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large periampullary masses with indeterminate origin and vascular contact represent a diagnostic and surgical challenge. While solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) is a rare pancreatic tumor with favorable prognosis, its presentation in the pancreatic head may lead to diagnostic uncertainty and influence operative strategy. A 37-year-old woman presented with a palpable right upper quadrant mass without systemic symptoms. Imaging revealed a large solid-cystic lesion in the cephalic-isthmic pancreas, closely abutting the superior mesenteric vein and exerting a mass effect on the duodenum. The exact origin of the tumor remained uncertain, raising the possibility of a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Given this ambiguity, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed and confirmed SPN. The patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Intraoperatively, the tumor was found to be well encapsulated and separable from the mesenteric vessels, allowing complete resection without vascular reconstruction. The postoperative course was uneventful, and histopathology confirmed SPN with negative margins. This case highlights the limitations of imaging in periampullary masses and underscores the value of preoperative tissue diagnosis when the origin of the lesion is unclear. It also illustrates that vascular contact does not necessarily indicate invasion in SPN and should not preclude surgical resection. In the setting of a large periampullary mass with vascular contact, careful diagnostic assessment, including selective use of endoscopic ultrasound, can guide appropriate surgical management; recognition that vascular contact in SPN frequently reflects displacement rather than true invasion is essential to avoid misclassification and to ensure optimal, appropriately assertive surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.