Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713231›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The sterile society: hyperselection and the loss of adaptive variance.

Jose C Yong, Simon S Groome, Edison Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jose C YongSchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Simon S GroomeSchool of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore, Singapore.
Edison TanSchool of Social and Health Sciences, James Cook University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-organizing systems utilize information to maintain ordered states. With competitive pressure, these systems optimize toward proxies of their goals-tractable indicators that are informationally useful because they simplify complex objectives, resulting in the survival and prevalence of systems that are most efficient at pursuing proxy targets. While proxy optimization enhances short-term success, it progressively strips away variance upon which long-term adaptation, resilience, and human flourishing depend. Modern technologies escalate these dynamics to intensities without clear evolutionary precedent, operating as a form of hyperselection on proxy-maximizing strategies which lead to increasingly formulaic, homogenized, and sterile environments. The detrimental impact of hyperselection and an overly optimized world-from pop culture and academia to urban design and wellbeing-are discussed in terms of their active role in creating evolutionary mismatch and the importance of seemingly "inefficient" processes as sources of adaptive input.

Indexed as

efficiencyevolutionary mismatchhomogeneityhyperselectionproxyeconomicsproxy optimizationself-organizationvariance

Identifiers

PMID42713231
PMCPMC13552006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.