ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2026
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Biologic Use in the Treatment of Veterans With Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Biologic medications, such as adalimumab, secukinumab, and bimekizumab, are currently the only medications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Low rates of biologic use in HS have been reported, with significant differences in prescription patterns by sex, race, and age. However, no studies have analyzed these metrics in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). This study evaluated HS therapy in the VHA and potential disparities in biologic prescription patterns for patients. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis used VHA data from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. Biologic prescriptions, including adalimumab and infliximab, were analyzed across varying patient demographics and characteristics. Results: In VHA, 29,483 individuals had ≥ 1 diagnosis of HS, of whom 5.2% were prescribed ≥ 1 biologic (adalimumab or infliximab). Most patients diagnosed with HS were White (60.6%), men (75.3%), and obese (59.3%) and had prior or current tobacco use (73.5%). An age-dependent reduction in the odds of being prescribed a biologic in patients with HS ( Conclusions: Biologic use in patients with HS was relatively low but higher or within the same range as previous studies. Understanding biologic prescription patterns offers potential to identify and improve access to underserved HS populations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.