ReviewClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2026
Dental Radiophobia: A Narrative Review of Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Public Health Consequences of Dental Radiography Fear in the Community - With a Focus on Both Patient and Clinician-Level Fear.
Review in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental radiography is an indispensable diagnostic tool, yet many patients experience fear specifically associated with radiographic examinations. This phenomenon-dental radiophobia-represents an exaggerated fear of ionizing radiation in the dental setting. This review examines both patient-level fear and clinician-level radiophobia, which manifests as unfounded concern about low-dose radiation that impedes CBCT adoption. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000-2025). Search terms included "dental radiophobia", "fear of dental X‑rays", and "dental radiography anxiety" combined with "prevalence", "risk factors", and "public health". Peer‑reviewed English‑language studies on human subjects were included. Data extraction was thematic. Results: General dental fear affects 10-20% of children/adolescents. In adults, meta‑analyses report a pooled prevalence of high dental anxiety of 18% (95% CI 10-30%) and dental phobia of 3%. For dental radiography, mean fear scores are low (0.8 ± 1.8 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale) but with high variance, and pain during intraoral procedures is a significant predictor. Key associated factors include female sex, younger age, lower education, prior painful radiographic experiences, limited radiation knowledge, and reliance on internet information. Clinician radiophobia (unfounded concern about low‑dose radiation) impedes CBCT adoption. Public health consequences include patient refusal of radiographs, avoidance of care, delayed diagnosis, increased oral disease burden, and medico‑legal liability. Conclusion: Dental radiophobia is a clinically relevant phenomenon with measurable prevalence, identifiable risk factors, and tangible public health implications. Effective management includes non‑pharmacological behavioral techniques, improved patient communication, and evidence‑based radiation risk communication. Future research should focus on validated instruments and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.