ArticlePulmonary circulation2026
Invasive Management for Acute-on-Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes in a Single-Center Cohort.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute-on-chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (acute-on-CTEPH) is associated with rapid clinical deterioration, yet the role of invasive intervention in the acute phase remains poorly defined. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute-on-CTEPH presenting with severe hypoxemia and/or cardiogenic shock at a single center between 2023 and 2026. Acute-on-CTEPH was defined as acute clinical deterioration requiring ventilatory or circulatory support, including ECMO, with imaging evidence of chronic thromboembolic disease and superimposed acute thrombi. Invasive strategies included pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) and/or balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), selected based on multidisciplinary assessment. The primary outcome was change in pulmonary hemodynamics; secondary outcomes included acute-phase mortality and clinical recovery after stabilization. A total of 15 patients (median age 69 years; 53% male), all in World Health Organization functional class IV, were included. Mechanical ventilation and ECMO were required in 53% and 47% of patients, respectively. Initial treatment consisted of PEA (40%) or BPA (60%), with combined approaches in selected cases. Acute-phase mortality was 20%. Among survivors, mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 42 to 17 mmHg, pulmonary vascular resistance from 11.6 to 2.4 WU, and cardiac index increased from 1.7 to 2.7 L/min/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.