ArticleIndian journal of psychiatry2026
Effectiveness of Brief Psychological Intervention for Depression in Pregnancy (BIND-P): A multi-centric randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Article in Indian journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing antenatal depression in primary care with the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9: Can It Be carried Out by auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM)?Asian journal of psychiatry · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Depression is the most prevalent psychiatric disorder among women during pregnancy but often goes undetected and untreated. Aim: This study aimed to assess whether a brief psychological intervention for depression in pregnancy (BIND-P) delivered by nurses is efficacious in the treatment of depression as compared to Treatment as Usual (TAU). Methods: A multi-centric, hospital-based open-label parallel group, randomized controlled trial was conducted at four sites across India (one each in Northern and Central India, and two in Southern India) from 2018 to 2022. A total of 1,352 participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to BIND-P and TAU groups. The primary outcome assessment was a reduction in PHQ-9 scores (from baseline to 8 weeks post recruitment). The secondary outcome was the outcome of pregnancy and infant development at 6/10/14 weeks post pregnancy. Results: Both groups demonstrated a reduction in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow-up. However, the between-group difference was not statistically significant (adjusted mean difference [BIND-P vs TAU]: 0.03; Conclusion: The BIND-P intervention was not inferior to TAU in reducing depressive symptoms but demonstrated lower discontinuation rates. As a low-intensity psychosocial intervention (LIPI), BIND-P may be a feasible and acceptable option for integration into routine maternal healthcare services, with potential to help reduce the treatment gap in perinatal mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.