ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Organ preservation after neoadjuvant immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: response assessment, watch-and-wait, and salvage surgery.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade has produced high pathological and clinical response rates in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer, raising the possibility of response-adapted organ preservation. However, the evidence is anatomically uneven and remains immature for routine surgery avoidance. In dMMR colon cancer, neoadjuvant studies primarily establish drug activity through resection-confirmed pathological and nodal response; reliable criteria for nonoperative assessment have not been validated. In dMMR rectal cancer, clinical complete response (cCR) after PD-1 blockade may support watch-and-wait in highly selected patients because local response can be reassessed using digital rectal examination, endoscopy, pelvic MRI, biopsy when appropriate, systemic imaging, and tumor markers. This narrative review critically appraises the biological rationale, prospective and observational evidence, response-assessment limitations, surgical decision points, surveillance requirements, toxicity, and unresolved controversies surrounding organ preservation after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. We use the term immune-response-adapted surgical deferral to emphasize that surgery remains available for incomplete response, unresolved uncertainty, or regrowth. Current implementation should be confined to experienced multidisciplinary programs with rigorous molecular confirmation, standardized multimodal assessment, reliable follow-up, informed patient participation, and timely salvage capacity. Particular attention is given to immunotherapy-specific uncertainty in defining durable cCR, the limitations of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a stand-alone local decision tool, hereditary-risk considerations in Lynch syndrome, and the need for location-specific prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.