ArticleCureus2026
Arthroscopic Treatment of Isolated Pectoralis Minor Syndrome After Two Unsuccessful Cervical Spine Procedures: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pectoralis minor syndrome (PMS) is an uncommon cause of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and is frequently overlooked because its clinical manifestations resemble cervical radiculopathy and other shoulder disorders. We report a case of a 67-year-old female who developed persistent upper-extremity pain and paresthesia despite undergoing two cervical spine procedures. Following comprehensive clinical evaluation, provocative testing, and brachial plexus magnetic resonance imaging, isolated PMS was diagnosed. The patient underwent arthroscopic pectoralis minor tenotomy combined with suprascapular nerve release and brachial plexus neurolysis, resulting in marked pain relief, functional recovery, and return to recreational activities after one year. This case highlights the importance of considering PMS in patients with persistent symptoms after cervical spine surgery and supports arthroscopic decompression as an effective treatment in carefully selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.