Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42713159›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026

Exploring the Dose-Response Relationship between Resistance-Training Volume and Psychophysiological Responses in Trained Males.

Alysson Enes, Guilherme Nass, Ragami C Alves, Mohan Adam E, Alec Piñero, Gustavo Oneda, Danilo Fonseca Leonel, Brad J Schoenfeld, Tácito P Souza-Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alysson EnesMetabolism, Nutrition and Strength Training Research Group, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8848-7946
Guilherme NassMetabolism, Nutrition and Strength Training Research Group, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Ragami C AlvesMetabolism, Nutrition and Strength Training Research Group, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Mohan Adam EApplied Muscle Development Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7860-1572
Alec PiñeroApplied Muscle Development Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8186-1889
Gustavo OnedaSports Center, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-1691
Danilo Fonseca LeonelAthletics and Endurance Runners Research Group (PACE), Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Jequitinhonha and Mucuri Valleys (UFVJM), Diamantina, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7583-0322
Brad J SchoenfeldApplied Muscle Development Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science and Recreation, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4979-5783
Tácito P Souza-JuniorMetabolism, Nutrition and Strength Training Research Group, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5147-7384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effects of different weekly-set progressions on perceptual responses and explored whether muscle thickness (MT) responses were related to perceptual and volume metrics in resistance-trained males. Thirty-one participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: a fixed set (FS) group (n = 10), maintaining 22 weekly quadriceps sets; a 4-Set (4S) group (n = 10) and a 6-Set (6S) group (n = 11), increasing by four and six every fortnight, respectively. Training occurred twice weekly for 12 weeks. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) and session feelings of pleasure/displeasure (sFPD) were assessed 15 min post-training, while sRPE-derived metrics (monotony and strain) were analyzed weekly. The sRPE was higher in the FS compared to the 4S group (p = 0.046), while sFPD were higher in the FS compared to the 6S group (p < 0.001). Monotony was lower in the 4S than in other groups (p < 0.001). Strain followed a graded dose-response (6S > 4S > FS, p < 0.001). Overall, there were no meaningful correlations between volume load slopes and MT (r < 0.392) or perceptual responses (r < 0.448). These findings suggest that progressive increases in weekly-set volume influence perceptual responses; however, these responses do not appear to be related to changes in muscle thickness.

Indexed as

feelings of pleasure/displeasuresession rating of perceived exertionstrength trainingtraining volumevolume load

Identifiers

PMID42713159
PMCPMC13551339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.