ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026
Exploring the Dose-Response Relationship between Resistance-Training Volume and Psychophysiological Responses in Trained Males.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of different weekly-set progressions on perceptual responses and explored whether muscle thickness (MT) responses were related to perceptual and volume metrics in resistance-trained males. Thirty-one participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: a fixed set (FS) group (n = 10), maintaining 22 weekly quadriceps sets; a 4-Set (4S) group (n = 10) and a 6-Set (6S) group (n = 11), increasing by four and six every fortnight, respectively. Training occurred twice weekly for 12 weeks. The session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) and session feelings of pleasure/displeasure (sFPD) were assessed 15 min post-training, while sRPE-derived metrics (monotony and strain) were analyzed weekly. The sRPE was higher in the FS compared to the 4S group (p = 0.046), while sFPD were higher in the FS compared to the 6S group (p < 0.001). Monotony was lower in the 4S than in other groups (p < 0.001). Strain followed a graded dose-response (6S > 4S > FS, p < 0.001). Overall, there were no meaningful correlations between volume load slopes and MT (r < 0.392) or perceptual responses (r < 0.448). These findings suggest that progressive increases in weekly-set volume influence perceptual responses; however, these responses do not appear to be related to changes in muscle thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.