ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Radiofrequency ablation for early breast cancer: from local technique to system-based surgical therapy.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive local treatment option for selected patients with early breast cancer, with potential advantages in cosmetic preservation and reduced physical burden. Breast RFA nevertheless requires organ-specific adaptation because abundant adipose tissue, superficial tumor location, and proximity to the skin and chest wall influence electrical impedance, heat conduction, ablation geometry, and safety. A meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 399 patients and 401 lesions smaller than 2 cm reported 99% technical success, 96% complete ablation, a mean ablation time of 15.8 minutes, and a pooled complication rate of 2%; however, most studies were small, and 65.7% of patients underwent post-ablation surgical excision. More recently, the multicenter, single-arm phase 3 RAFAELO study treated 370 patients with Tis-T1 tumors measuring 1.5 cm or less and reported 98.6% 5-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free survival among 353 patients completing follow-up, with two ipsilateral recurrences. These results are encouraging but remain conditioned by strict selection, mandatory radiotherapy, protocolized surveillance, and the absence of a concurrent randomized surgical control. This review therefore frames breast RFA as a system-based local therapy rather than an isolated technical maneuver. It details causes and recognizable patterns of insufficient ablation, proposes a minimum framework for reproducible technical and reporting standardization, summarizes quantitative efficacy and safety outcomes, and emphasizes post-ablation imaging, biopsy when indicated, and predefined rescue strategies. Breast RFA should not be regarded as a universal replacement for breast-conserving surgery; its safe use requires multidisciplinary selection, reproducible image-guided execution, objective procedural documentation, structured surveillance, and prospective comparative validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.