ArticleWorld development2026
Hydropower development, resettlement, and urban water security: Evidence from Brazil's Belo Monte Dam.
Article in World development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Millions of people are resettled each year when dam construction floods their homes and land. Dam building and its associated resettlement may impact water security by altering access to drinking water and sanitation, disrupting aquatic ecosystems, shifting local economies, and undermining the ability to use rivers for income, navigation, and cultural practices. This paper explores how dam-induced-displacement and resettlement in the Brazilian Amazon shaped women's experiences of water (in)security along four dimensions: Access, Safety, Livelihoods, and Culture. We conducted in-depth interviews with 70 women in the city of Altamira who were impacted by the Belo Monte Dam and who had participated in household surveys before dam construction began. Our findings suggest that dam building and resettlement did not universally improve or degrade water security, but rather shifted it in uneven ways. While access to water improved for some women, the majority of respondents experienced water outages after the dam, some for weeks at a time. Safety from seasonal flooding and access to sanitation improved for many, though poor water quality and lack of maintenance of sanitation infrastructure created problems. Finally, resettlement and changes in river ecology undermined livelihoods for fisheries-dependent households and severed cultural connections to the river for many. These findings have crucial implications for health outcomes and can inform policies to improve the water security and well-being of populations resettled due to future dams, other development projects, and climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.