ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Enablers and Barriers Among Women Ophthalmologists: A National Cross-Sectional Survey in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the self-perceived enablers and barriers among female ophthalmologists practising in health centres nationwide across Saudi Arabia. It also reviews their work-life balance, psychological wellbeing, experience of workplace discrimination, maternity-related challenges, and the personal and institutional factors that facilitate or hinder their professional and maternal roles. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional, face-to-face survey was conducted among female ophthalmologists practising in health centres nationwide across Saudi Arabia over an eight-month period (October 2023 - June 2024). Participants were interviewed using a structured, piloted, and back-translated questionnaire. Self-perceived work-life balance (WLB), psychological wellbeing, happiness at home and at the workplace, experience of workplace discrimination, maternity-related challenges, and personal and institutional facilitating and impeding factors were assessed. Associations between WLB and demographic, family-related, and workplace variables were explored using non-parametric statistical tests. Results: Fifty-five female ophthalmologists were enrolled in the study. Key enablers included strong family support (94.5%), spousal understanding (78.2%), and satisfactory WLB in 40 participants (72.7%). The predominant barriers were psychological unrest in 32 participants (58.2%), workplace discrimination in 27 (49.1%), and disproportionate childcare responsibility in 46 (83.6%). Median happiness scores were higher at home (9.0; IQR 8-9) than at the workplace (8.0; IQR 7-8). Most participants (61.8%) experienced their first birth during ophthalmology residency. The principal institutional barriers were workplace inflexibility (38.2%) and children's demands on maternal time (83.6%). No statistically significant associations were identified between WLB and age, number of children, or spouse's occupation (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Female ophthalmologists in health centres nationwide across Saudi Arabia navigate a dual reality of meaningful enablers - including strong family networks, high WLB satisfaction, and effective personal coping strategies - alongside significant barriers, most notably psychological unrest, workplace discrimination, and institutional inflexibility. Targeted institutional and policy-level interventions are urgently needed to strengthen the enablers while systematically reducing the barriers faced by this workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.