ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial intelligence analysis of continuous wave Doppler spectra to detect reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: To develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approach that analyses continuous-wave (CW) Doppler spectra from the aortic valve (AV) to detect reduced (≤40%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) without requiring dedicated two-dimensional left ventricular imaging or ECG-gated volumetric analysis for model inference. Current AI solutions for LVEF assessment rely on 2D imaging and ECG signals, limiting utility when data quality is poor. Methods and results: This retrospective study analysed 4231 aortic CW Doppler recordings from 3988 examinations (3580 patients). Preprocessing yielded 13 359 single-peak images. A CoAtNet-2 neural network was developed using patient-level training and validation cohorts and evaluated on an independent held-out test cohort. The network generated predictions for each single-peak image, and these probabilities were then averaged per examination. Maximum AV blood flow velocity and average CW Doppler pixel intensity were measured. LVEF ≤40% occurred in 20.8% of examinations, associating with lower maximum AV velocity and higher average pixel intensity. In the independent test cohort (782 examinations), the model achieved 85.2% accuracy, 79.0% sensitivity, 86.7% specificity, an AUC of 0.906, an NPV of 94.3%, and a PPV of 59.9%, with robust performance across subgroups. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of using AI to analyse CW Doppler spectra for rapid, non-invasive identification of reduced LVEF without requiring dedicated two-dimensional left ventricular imaging or ECG-gated volumetric analysis for model inference. By leveraging underutilized echocardiographic Doppler data, this signal-based approach may serve as an adjunctive screening or rule-out tool, particularly when standard imaging or ECG-gated analysis is limited or delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.