ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2026
Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease-guided adjuvant therapy in solid tumors: Current evidence, clinical trial frameworks, and future directions.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The postoperative management of resectable solid tumors depends on clinicopathological risk stratification. However, these static criteria often fail to identify occult minimal residual disease (MRD), resulting in suboptimal adjuvant treatment characterized by either overtreatment or undertreatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based MRD detection has emerged as a transformative molecular strategy to bridge this gap, allowing for the identification of residual disease at extremely low molecular abundance. Recent technological advances in ultra-sensitive assays have enabled the clinical translation of ctDNA assessment across diverse solid malignancies. Increasing evidence indicates that postoperative MRD status offers superior prognostic stratification and identifies molecular recurrence significantly earlier than conventional imaging. Furthermore, MRD is increasingly being evaluated as a dynamic tool to tailor adjuvant therapy, facilitating treatment intensification for MRD-positive cohorts and potential de-escalation for MRD-negative populations. This review summarizes the evolution of ctDNA-based MRD detection technologies and the clinical evidence supporting MRD-guided adjuvant strategies. We critically examine the nuances between tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic approaches. Additionally, cancer-specific variations in ctDNA shedding and clinical evidence maturity are highlighted, along with the integration of MRD into prospective interventional trial designs. We argue that MRD is currently best utilized as a biological stratification and trial-enabling tool, rather than a definitive standalone criterion for routine practice. Furthermore, technical, biological, and clinical hurdles hindering widespread implementation, including sensitivity thresholds, background noise, and standardization gaps, are addressed. Results from ongoing interventional trials will be pivotal in defining optimal thresholds and monitoring frameworks, ultimately determining whether MRD-guided precision management improves survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.