ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026
Lineup Types and Key Variables for Success in Men's Paralympic Wheelchair Basketball.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding team performance dynamics in wheelchair basketball (WB) is crucial for optimising lineup compositions for different game situations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of lineup composition and game time on performance in men's WB at the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games. Through the analysis of 588 lineups from 42 matches, key game-related statistics (GRS) that differentiated winning from losing lineups were identified. Seventy different lineup types (LTs) were clustered and categorised based on players' functional classification (FC) and their performance across time windows was examined. Discriminant analysis revealed that field goal efficiency, assists, and minimising opponent assists were crucial for success, regardless of game balance, emphasising the importance of both offensive and defensive efficacy. Clustering categorised LTs into three distinct groups, with those featuring predominantly intermediate-point players (2.0-3.5) exhibiting superior performance, particularly during extended playing time (over 10 minutes), indicating a strategic advantage for these compositions in sustaining high-level play. Top-ranked teams typically showed greater roster depth and a wider variation of LT utilisation. This research highlights the significance of strategic lineup composition, emphasising the sustained effectiveness of lineups with intermediate FC players. The findings provide valuable insights for coaches, aiding in data-driven decisions for lineup selection, game strategy optimisation, and functional player development within the specific demands of WB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.