ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Graph neural networks for multi-scale gene-drug interaction modeling in cancer: applications, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer drug resistance.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer drug resistance remains a major clinical challenge driven by complex genetic, signaling, and microenvironmental interactions. Conventional machine learning and deep learning represent genes, drugs, and patients as independent feature vectors, limiting their ability to capture biological relationships governing therapeutic response. Graph neural networks have emerged as a powerful paradigm by modelling biological systems as interconnected networks rather than isolated entities. This review synthesizes recent advances in graph neural network based multi-scale modelling of gene-drug interactions across cancer research, emphasizing translational relevance to breast cancer drug resistance. Although many architectures originate from pan-cancer or methodological studies, their potential for breast cancer is critically assessed while distinguishing models directly validated from those requiring adaptation. Recent architectures, including hierarchical, heterogeneous, knowledge graph-guided, explainable, and graph-augmented models, demonstrate strong predictive performance across oncology tasks. These studies computationally nominated potential targets such as FAK, FLT3, COX8A, SEC61G, and CYP27B1, though predictions require experimental validation in breast cancer resistance models. The field has leveraged established synthetic lethal relationships, such as BRCA1/PARP, as benchmarks for GNN-based discovery frameworks. Despite encouraging progress, current evidence remains largely retrospective, benchmark-based, or preclinical. Cross-cohort heterogeneity, limited interpretability, and scarce breast cancer-specific resistance validation represent central limitations. Future integration with spatial transcriptomics, multimodal omics, and federated learning may improve precision oncology, but rigorous biological validation and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.