ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Effects of multisensory interventions initiated during NICU hospitalization on neurodevelopment in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of multisensory interventions primarily initiated during NICU hospitalization or before discharge on neurodevelopment in preterm infants, informing clinical practice. While most interventions were delivered during the NICU stay, a minority involved post-discharge continuation through parental care plans. The study was conducted in strict accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251090728). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of multisensory intervention vs. standard neonatal care on neurological outcomes were included. The majority of interventions were delivered during NICU hospitalization; two studies involved post-discharge continuation through parental-implemented care plans. The intervention group received stimuli targeting two or more sensory modalities, while the control group received standard care or standard care supplemented with a single sensory intervention. Results: A total of 13 studies meeting the eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled statistical analysis revealed that preterm infants receiving multisensory intervention exhibited significantly better neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to those receiving standard care or unisensory intervention (SMD = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.47 1.45, Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that multisensory intervention initiated during the neonatal period (NICU hospitalization and early postnatal period) is an effective and safe approach for promoting neurodevelopment in preterm infants. However, due to the clinical heterogeneity observed among the included studies and the limited number of studies with post-discharge follow-up, further research is warranted to evaluate optimal timing, duration, and long-term effects across the continuum of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.