ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Electro-mechanical risk score for coronary artery disease risk estimation using seismocardiography.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy of Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography for Non-Invasive Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis: A Comparison With Coronary Artery Calcium Computed Tomography, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, and Invasive Coronary Angiography
Evaluation and Improvement of Diagnostic Accuracy of Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography for Non-Invasive Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis in Comparison With Coronary Artery Calcium Computed Tomography, Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, and Invasive Coronary Angiography
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity. Existing clinical likelihood models often lack specificity, contributing to unnecessary diagnostic testing. To develop, train, and validate the electro-mechanical risk (EMR) Score. This machine learning model uses cardiac mechanical information from resting seismocardiography (SCG) recordings and patient-level clinical risk factors to estimate obstructive CAD likelihood. Methods and results: This multi-centre clinical study included 2110 adults. Resting SCG was recorded using a sternum accelerometer. Obstructive CAD was defined as 50% or greater stenosis on coronary computed tomography angiography or invasive coronary angiography. A one-dimensional convolutional neural network was trained to compute the EMR Score. Performance was evaluated using repeated cross-validation and external-centre validation and compared with the 2024 ESC Risk-Factor-weighted Clinical Likelihood (RF-CL) model. Among 2110 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [10.3] years; 801 women [38%]), 760 had obstructive CAD. In symptomatic individuals, the EMR Score achieved an AUC of 0.88, outperforming RF-CL (AUC, 0.85; Conclusion: The EMR Score non-invasively estimated obstructive CAD likelihood, with external-centre validation supporting generalizability beyond internal cross-validation. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06880120, NCT06880133).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.