ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Oncofetal reprogramming and cellular plasticity in colorectal cancer: from mechanisms to clinical translation.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) progression and metastasis, as well as tolerance to therapy, are driven not only by genetic alterations but also by cell-state plasticity. Oncofetal reprogramming (OnF) refers to the reactivation of fetal intestinal developmental or injury-repair programs in tumor cells, thereby weakening adult lineage identity and enhancing the capacity for state transitions. Available evidence suggests that, in specific Wnt-dependent or APC-aberrant contexts, YAP/TAZ-TEAD and AP-1 may act cooperatively to establish and maintain the OnF state, whereas Wnt, EGFR-MAPK, FGF/FGFR, TGF-β, and extracellular matrix signaling contribute to its establishment and maintenance in a context-dependent manner. The OnF state can also intersect with epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity, dynamic stemness, drug-tolerant persister states, and immune and stromal niches, collectively increasing cellular heterogeneity, adaptability to therapy, and relapse potential in CRC. This review discusses the conceptual boundaries and operational criteria for identifying OnF in CRC, examines its regulatory mechanisms, plasticity-associated phenotypes, and translational relevance, and emphasizes the importance of distinguishing direct evidence of OnF from evidence of related plasticity mechanisms. Further elucidation of the OnF state may facilitate biomarker development and anti-plasticity therapies, although its clinical translation will require standardized state classification and clinical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.