SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Effects of virtual reality interventions on motor skills in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Virtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly applied in rehabilitation and adapted physical activity programmes for children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities (ID). However, evidence on the efficacy of VR-based interventions in improving motor skills is limited and inconclusive. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of VR-based interventions on motor skills in children and adolescents with ID and summarise the methodological quality of the available evidence. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched for English-language VR intervention studies involving children and adolescents with ID or related conditions affecting intellectual function. Study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted systematically. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Where sufficient data were available, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect sizes, and subgroup analyses were conducted to compare the immersive and non-immersive VR interventions. Results: Ten studies involving 414 participants were included. VR interventions had significant positive effects on gross motor skills, locomotor skills, object-control skills, balance, agility and strength. Subgroup analyses indicated favourable effects for both immersive and non-immersive VR; significant subgroup differences were observed in gross motor skills. Conclusion: VR-based interventions may improve motor-related outcomes in children and adolescents with ID, although effect robustness varied across domains and the apparent advantage of immersive VR remains exploratory. Adequately powered, rigorously designed randomised controlled trials with standardised outcomes are needed to confirm these findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251088479, identifier CRD420251088479.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.