ArticleJournal of human kinetics2026
Acute Optimization of Squat Jump Performance in Trained Collegiate Sprinters through Knee Angle-Specific Isometric Training.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the activation of major lower limb muscles during isometric squats (ISs) at different knee angles and their effects as a conditioning activity (CA) on squat jump (SJ) performance at varying initial knee angles. Twelve collegiate sprinters were randomly assigned to three conditions: control (CC), 90°IS condition (90°ISC), and 120°IS condition (120°ISC), using a balanced crossover design. EMG data from five lower limb muscles were collected during ISs, alongside the peak center of mass velocity (V peak), peak force (F peak), peak power (P peak), average power (P avg), and the force-velocity ratio at peak power (SFV) during subsequent SJs. Results showed that the 90°IS condition elicited higher rectus femoris (p = 0.035, d = 0.729) activation, while the 120°IS condition led to greater soleus (p = 0.030, d = 0.759), and tibialis anterior (p = 0.022, d = 0.812) activation. Both the 90°ISC and the 120°ISC significantly increased peak velocity (90°ISC: p < 0.001, d = 1.379; 120°ISC: p < 0.001, d = 0.979) compared to the CC, but showed no significant improvements in F peak or P peak. Notably, the SFV during the 90° and 120°SJ was significantly lower in the 90°ISC and the 120°ISC compared to the CC (90°ISC: p < 0.001, d = -2.658; 120°ISC: p < 0.001, d = -1.785). These findings suggest that the IS at different knee angles selectively activates lower limb muscles and enhances velocity-related performance metrics. Specific IS angles can alter the force-velocity relationship, increasing the velocity component at peak power during subsequent movements. Coaches and athletes in speed-dependent sports are encouraged to select IS angles tailored to their specific training goals and performance needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.