ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2026
AI agents in cancer imaging: Concepts, advances, and clinical perspectives.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical imaging serves as a critical source of evidence for cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. However, most existing medical imaging artificial intelligence (AI) systems still operate on predefined tasks and inputs, limiting their ability to address the evolving needs of clinical practice and research. AI agents use foundation models as central engines for reasoning and orchestration. They organize analytical processes according to task objectives, invoke external tools and data resources, and adapt subsequent actions based on intermediate results. They may therefore facilitate a shift in cancer imaging AI from isolated model applications toward continuous workflow support. This review outlines the fundamental principles, system components, and evaluation approaches for AI agents from a cancer imaging perspective and summarizes representative advances in image interpretation, clinical decision support, and research workflows. Current evidence suggests that agents can connect previously fragmented imaging, clinical, and knowledge resources, thereby potentially improving the continuity and traceability of complex tasks. Nevertheless, clinical evidence for AI agents remains limited, as most studies have been conducted in controlled settings and have yet to demonstrate consistent value in real-world clinical workflows. Clinical translation is further constrained by the computational demands and potential error propagation inherent in multistep execution, as well as by the dependence of agent performance on specific tools, data environments, and workflow configurations. Future research should move beyond task-level performance toward system-level validation, with particular emphasis on whether agents can reliably organize information, interpret findings, and collaborate effectively with clinicians. Such evidence will be essential to clarify their practical role in cancer imaging care and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.