ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2026
Reirradiation and teclistamab in relapsed multiple myeloma: initial experience in two heavily pretreated patients with extensive disease.
Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article is aimed to report our initial experience with the bispecific T-cell engager teclistamab administered with concomitant radiotherapy, including reirradiation, in two patients with widespread multiple myeloma, including hepatic and meningeal relapse, respectively. This is a retrospective patient record assessment at a single institution. Both patients had previously received several lines of systemic therapy and radiotherapy to multiple target volumes, resulting in a considerable cumulative bone marrow dose when completing their recent courses in 2025. The Patient 1 started current radiotherapy with already compromised blood cell counts, while the Patient 2 had preserved values, except for lymphocytes. Both patients rapidly developed grade 4 haematological toxicity (white blood cells and platelets) but recovered within few weeks. Radiotherapy did not cause other acute toxicity greater than grade 2. Given the serious haematological toxicity observed in our patients, hospitalization and close monitoring by a dedicated team of experienced haematologists may become necessary in complex settings like those described here. Their expertise might also be required to manage cytokine release syndrome and potentially life-threatening neutropenic infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.